Why Australian Government Requires WCAG Compliance
WCAG 2.1 AA conformance is a baseline expectation across Australian government digital policy and procurement.
Commonwealth Government Requirements
Suppliers are typically expected to show current, dated evidence and clear remediation pathways.
Ongoing evidence doesn’t mean continuous monitoring; it means maintaining a series of dated, repeatable point-in-time evidence reports across major releases and procurement events.
State and Territory Requirements
Policy language varies by jurisdiction, but AA-level accessibility evidence remains the practical standard.
Preparing Procurement-Ready Evidence
- VPAT / conformance documentation
- Timestamped automated and manual testing records
- Accessibility statement and issue remediation documentation
- Evidence mapped to release and tender dates
Ongoing evidence doesn’t mean continuous monitoring; it means maintaining a series of dated, repeatable point-in-time evidence reports across major releases and procurement events.
Common Pitfalls for Government Suppliers
- Leaving testing too close to submission deadlines
- Submitting incomplete documentation packages
- Treating Level A conformance as sufficient
Building Competitive Advantage Through Accessibility
Suppliers with reliable, current evidence packages are easier to evaluate and lower-risk in procurement.
Prepare Your Procurement-Ready Evidence
Start building your accessibility documentation with a comprehensive WCAG 2.1 Level AA evidence report.
Related guides
Website Accessibility Requirements Australia: The DDA Guide
Everything Australian organizations need to know about the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 and website accessibility obligations.
Evidence StrategyAccessibility Audit vs. Ongoing Monitoring
Understanding the difference between point-in-time evidence reports and continuous monitoring, and when each approach is appropriate.
Legal Disclaimer: This guide provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice.